Method Comparison of PT, INR, and aPTT Results Obtained Using Two Coagulation Analyzers in Routine Laboratory Practice
Betül Özbek Kurtul, Bağnu Dündar, Gül İpek Gündoğan, Sevgi Kocyigit Sevinc, Tuğba Elgün, Asiye Gök Yurttaş · 2026
Read Method Comparison of PT, INR, and aPTT Results Obtained Using Two Coagulation Analyzers in Routine Laboratory Practice by Betül Özbek Kurtul, Bağnu Dündar, Gül İpek Gündoğan, Sevgi Kocyigit Sevinc, Tuğba Elgün, Asiye Gök Yurttaş (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13605254.txt.
Description
Betül Özbek Kurtul and co-authors compare two blood clotting analyzers in a 2026 study. Three clotting tests guide dosing and surgery decisions every day. Different machines and reagents can shift results enough to matter. Leftover patient plasma samples ran on both systems for a head to head check.
Dozens of paired readings covered the three tests in routine samples. Statistical checks found no firm constant or proportional bias overall. Average gaps were small for two tests and larger for the third. Abnormal results were rare, which limited how far agreement could be judged.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Betül Özbek Kurtul, Bağnu Dündar, Gül İpek Gündoğan, Sevgi Kocyigit Sevinc, Tuğba Elgün, Asiye Gök Yurttaş |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 31 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |