Authors’ reply to comments on erector spinae plane block versus thoracic paravertebral block in pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Fatma Nabil, Ahmed M. Mandour, Amr M. Abdelgawad, Deiaaeldin M. Tamer, Ahmed A. Shahat, Mohamed Anwar, Hany M. Osman · 2026
Read Authors’ reply to comments on erector spinae plane block versus thoracic paravertebral block in pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy by Fatma Nabil, Ahmed M. Mandour, Amr M. Abdelgawad, Deiaaeldin M. Tamer, Ahmed A. Shahat, Mohamed Anwar, Hany M. Osman (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13594610.txt.
Description
ients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.3 Their comments provide an important opportunity to clarify the interpretation of our findings, particularly regarding trial design, analytic population, procedural time, and safety considerations. First, our study was designed and powered for the primary outcome as a superiority trial, not as an equivalence or non-inferiority trial.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Fatma Nabil, Ahmed M. Mandour, Amr M. Abdelgawad, Deiaaeldin M. Tamer, Ahmed A. Shahat, Mohamed Anwar, Hany M. Osman |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 4 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |