Toric versus Standard Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation for Low Myopic Astigmatism: A 12-Month Retrospective Study
Haiyan He, Zhanchi Hu, Runhua Peng, Liangqi Feng, Chi Xiao · 2026
Read Toric versus Standard Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation for Low Myopic Astigmatism: A 12-Month Retrospective Study by Haiyan He, Zhanchi Hu, Runhua Peng, Liangqi Feng, Chi Xiao (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13592337.txt.
Description
Haiyan He and co-authors compare two implantable lenses for eyes with mild astigmatism, in a 2026 review of 124 patients followed for a year. One lens corrects astigmatism directly; the plain version leaves it to chance. Both were implanted for low myopia with slight astigmatism, and vision, refraction, and quality measures were tracked.
Both lenses proved safe and effective with stable results. The astigmatism-correcting lens left less residual blur and slightly sharper uncorrected vision, while measured visual quality improved equally in both groups. Because patients were not randomized, the authors warn against declaring a winner and advise weighing the small gain against cost and safety for each person.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Haiyan He, Zhanchi Hu, Runhua Peng, Liangqi Feng, Chi Xiao |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 38 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |