인공호흡기 관련 폐렴과 인공호흡기 관련 사건 감시체계의 비교 분석: 후향적 관찰 연구
Seo Jin Jeon, Jae Geum Ryu · 2026
Read 인공호흡기 관련 폐렴과 인공호흡기 관련 사건 감시체계의 비교 분석: 후향적 관찰 연구 by Seo Jin Jeon, Jae Geum Ryu (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13533606.txt.
Description
Seo Jin Jeon and Jae Geum Ryu compare two ways of watching ventilator harm in a 2026 Korean study. The patients numbered nine hundred forty-two. All were intensive care patients on ventilators for over two days. Records were reviewed under both systems. One is the classic pneumonia definition. The other is a newer event-based definition. The newer one is more mechanical and less judgment-based.
The event system flagged far more cases. It found eight per thousand ventilator days against about three. It also took under a third of the staff time per patient. Long ventilation raised both risks. Steroid use tracked the pneumonia flags. Deep sedation days tracked event flags but not pneumonia. Readers get evidence the two systems complement each other.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Seo Jin Jeon, Jae Geum Ryu |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 41 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |