Impact of Swift Versus Spray Coagulation on Procedural Outcomes in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Berk Bas, Ömer Küçükdemirci, Altay Kandemir, İsmail Taşkıran, Mehmet Hadi Yaşa, Halil Şahin, Müge Erdem · 2026
Read Impact of Swift Versus Spray Coagulation on Procedural Outcomes in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection by Berk Bas, Ömer Küçükdemirci, Altay Kandemir, İsmail Taşkıran, Mehmet Hadi Yaşa, Halil Şahin, Müge Erdem (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/PMC13455515.txt.
Description
Berk Bas and six colleagues compare, in a 2026 study, two electrical settings used to seal blood vessels during stomach tumor removal by endoscope. The procedure, endoscopic submucosal dissection, cures early stomach growths, yet bleeding during the work is common. One center reviewed 194 patients treated from 2021 to 2025, split between spray and swift coagulation modes.
Spray mode finished faster, averaging about 38 minutes against 44 for swift. Bleeding during the procedure struck about 44 percent of spray cases against 75 percent of swift cases, and rescue forceps were needed less often. Severe bleeding stayed rare and similar in both arms. Later bleeding, perforation, recurrence, and narrowing also matched between groups. Success rates sat near 94 percent in both. The authors favor spray mode for speed and calmer procedures at their center.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Berk Bas, Ömer Küçükdemirci, Altay Kandemir, İsmail Taşkıran, Mehmet Hadi Yaşa, Halil Şahin, Müge Erdem |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 32816 |
| LICENSE | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |