A propensity score-matched NSQIP analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy in inflammatory bowel disease
I. S. Alam, H. H. Aydinli, Z. Gajic, C. Atallah, B. Safar, J. Simon, M. J. Grieco, A. da Luz Moreira · 2026
Read A propensity score-matched NSQIP analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy in inflammatory bowel disease by I. S. Alam, H. H. Aydinli, Z. Gajic, C. Atallah, B. Safar, J. Simon, M. J. Grieco, A. da Luz Moreira (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13391767.txt.
Description
I. S. Alam's team weighed open, keyhole, and robotic total belly colon removal with end ileum opening for immune bowel disease, using matched national records data from 2022. Lightly cutting techniques have better bowel results, but head-to-head evidence for this extensive operation was limited.
Among 581 matched patients, eighty-three robotic, four hundred fifteen keyhole, and eighty-three open, overall thirty-day illness did not differ clearly. Robotic surgery took clearly longer than keyhole surgery, and secondary results including stay, return stays, and exact complications round out a comparison surgeons can weigh against surgery time.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | I. S. Alam, H. H. Aydinli, Z. Gajic, C. Atallah, B. Safar, J. Simon, M. J. Grieco, A. da Luz Moreira |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 28 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |