Cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: a retrospective cohort study
Salamaiti Abudurehemu, Xuanhui Wang, Jue Wang, Tianyu Liu, Ming Chen · 2026
Read Cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: a retrospective cohort study by Salamaiti Abudurehemu, Xuanhui Wang, Jue Wang, Tianyu Liu, Ming Chen (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13362171.txt.
Description
Salamaiti Abudurehemu and four co-authors compare two operations for a pre-cancerous cervical condition, in a 2026 study. The condition, adenocarcinoma in situ, is treated by cutting out a cone of cervical tissue, either with a cold knife or with an electric loop. Records from a major Chinese hospital covered two hundred fifty-one patients treated from 2021 to 2024. About two thirds received the loop procedure and the rest the knife operation.
The knife group had fewer positive margins, meaning fewer cuts that left abnormal cells at the edge. About thirty percent of all patients later had a hysterectomy. With a median follow-up of three years, the study also weighs recurrence-free survival and the risk factors behind it, evidence for a choice surgeons make weekly.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Salamaiti Abudurehemu, Xuanhui Wang, Jue Wang, Tianyu Liu, Ming Chen |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 27 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |