Comparison of efficacy and safety between native tissue repair and transvaginal mesh for uterine prolapse: a retrospective study
Jing He, Huijuan Wang, Wei Wang, Na Dong · 2026
Read Comparison of efficacy and safety between native tissue repair and transvaginal mesh for uterine prolapse: a retrospective study by Jing He, Huijuan Wang, Wei Wang, Na Dong (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/PMC13314773.txt.
Description
Jing He, Huijuan Wang, Wei Wang, and Na Dong compare two surgery styles for womb prolapse in work published in 2026. Repair with the patient own tissue and repair with a vaginal mesh are the two main routes, and past results clash on which wins on gains and safety.
The study drew 86 patients treated from January 2022 to December 2024, split into a native tissue group of 37 and a mesh group of 49, as counted in the report. The team compared surgery measures, symptom scores, quality of life scores, and patient-rated success. Complications and relapse within one year were also logged. Head-to-head data from one hospital can help women and surgeons weigh a mesh against its known late risks.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Jing He, Huijuan Wang, Wei Wang, Na Dong |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 29477 |
| LICENSE | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |