Motivations and barriers to engaging in peer review: a qualitative study
Júlio Belo Fernandes, Ana Silva Almeida, Faiza Magsi, Ana Catarina Maia, Sónia Fernandes · 2026
Read Motivations and barriers to engaging in peer review: a qualitative study by Júlio Belo Fernandes, Ana Silva Almeida, Faiza Magsi, Ana Catarina Maia, Sónia Fernandes (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/PMC13277020.txt.
Description
Júlio Belo Fernandes leads a 2026 interview study of why academics agree, or refuse, to review other researchers' work for journals. Peer review is the check that helps guard research quality, yet little is known about reviewers' own views. The team held recorded interviews with health science academics between June and September 2025.
Twenty-seven academics from seven fields took part. Reasons to review included helping science, learning, career growth, personal satisfaction, and pay. Barriers included heavy workload, weak recognition, doubts about skill, worries about honesty, and poor journal handling. Weighing the two sides shaped each choice. Better recognition and journal support could keep reviewers willing, the authors conclude.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Júlio Belo Fernandes, Ana Silva Almeida, Faiza Magsi, Ana Catarina Maia, Sónia Fernandes |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 41622 |
| LICENSE | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |