Transcervical carotid artery stenting compared to transfemoral carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy: perioperative and short-term results from a single center
Wenxu Jin, Haizhen Ni, Chongqing Huang, Lemen Pan, Yihui Qiu, Jingyong Huang, Guanfeng Yu · 2026
Read Transcervical carotid artery stenting compared to transfemoral carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy: perioperative and short-term results from a single center by Wenxu Jin, Haizhen Ni, Chongqing Huang, Lemen Pan, Yihui Qiu, Jingyong Huang, Guanfeng Yu (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13271929.txt.
Description
Wenxu Jin and colleagues compare in 2026 three ways to reopen a narrowed neck artery at one hospital. Surgeons can cut the artery open and clean it, place a stent through the leg artery, or place a stent through a small neck incision. Each route carries different risks and costs.
Records covered 220 patients treated between 2020 and 2024, split among the three approaches. Stroke rates around surgery were low and similar in all groups, and six-month narrowing rates also matched. Nerve injury appeared only after the open operation, while hospital costs were lowest for that same route. The neck-route stent looked promising for patients with difficult anatomy.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Wenxu Jin, Haizhen Ni, Chongqing Huang, Lemen Pan, Yihui Qiu, Jingyong Huang, Guanfeng Yu |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 24 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |