Cost analysis of the use of digital rectoscopy versus flexible sigmoidoscopy in rectal cancer patients undergoing watch and wait

Harpreet Kaur Sekhon Inderjit Singh, Holly Harper, Valentin Butnari, Rebecca Beni, Emilio Lozano, Arnold Goede · 2026

Read Cost analysis of the use of digital rectoscopy versus flexible sigmoidoscopy in rectal cancer patients undergoing watch and wait by Harpreet Kaur Sekhon Inderjit Singh, Holly Harper, Valentin Butnari, Rebecca Beni, Emilio Lozano, Arnold Goede (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/PMC13264957.txt.

Description

Harpreet Kaur Sekhon Inderjit Singh and co-authors wrote a 2026 cost study on checking rectal cancer patients who keep their rectum after treatment, a plan called watch and wait. These patients need scope checks every few months for two years to catch early return of cancer. A digital scope device used in clinic, without sedation, may do the job for less.

The team costed 177 digital checks done in one NHS service and modeled the standard flexible scope for comparison. Over two years and seven checks, digital checks cost about 769 pounds per patient against about 1,588 pounds for the standard scope without sedation. Staff time during the check and recovery drove most of the gap. Extra analyses under varied assumptions kept the same result. The authors conclude the digital route saves at least about 820 pounds per patient.

Catalog record

CREATORHarpreet Kaur Sekhon Inderjit Singh, Holly Harper, Valentin Butnari, Rebecca Beni, Emilio Lozano, Arnold Goede
YEAR2026
COLLECTIONPAPERS
FORMATTXT
FILE SIZE38029
LICENSEhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
RIGHTSCC BY
SOURCEEurope PMC

Source: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/PMC13264957

Browse the full library · About the Tower of Babel