Stated preferences in the Iranian health system: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments and conjoint analysis
Lucie Sabin, Mohammad Hajizadeh, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Ali Kiadaliri · 2026
Read Stated preferences in the Iranian health system: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments and conjoint analysis by Lucie Sabin, Mohammad Hajizadeh, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Ali Kiadaliri (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13217655.txt.
Description
Lucie Sabin and co-authors present a 2026 systematic review of discrete choice experiments in Iran's health system. These experiments learn what patients, clinicians, and the public value by asking them to choose between carefully varied hypothetical options, and Iranian use of the method is booming.
Thirty studies met the criteria, most published from 2021 onward, concentrated in cities, especially Tehran, and focused on health services and the workforce. Money, time, risk, and health outcomes were the usual attributes traded off. Quality was uneven: pilot testing and groundwork with target populations were inconsistent, nearly half used efficient experimental designs, and reporting of software, blocking, and opt-out choices was often missing. Conditional logit was the commonest estimator. The authors call for more diverse samples and tougher methods.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Lucie Sabin, Mohammad Hajizadeh, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Ali Kiadaliri |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 33 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |