Mid-Term Outcomes of Posterior Pelvic Reconstruction Combined with Lateral Abdominal Wall Suspension versus Sacrocolpopexy for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Guanghua Chu, Chunyan Hu, Qi Deng · 2026
Read Mid-Term Outcomes of Posterior Pelvic Reconstruction Combined with Lateral Abdominal Wall Suspension versus Sacrocolpopexy for Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Comparative Study by Guanghua Chu, Chunyan Hu, Qi Deng (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13206280.txt.
Description
Two laparoscopic operations for severe pelvic organ prolapse are compared in a 2026 retrospective study authored by Guanghua Chu. Both approaches were paired with the same posterior repair: the standard sacrocolpopexy, which anchors tissue to the spine, and lateral abdominal wall suspension, which fixes it sideways instead.
Records covered 132 women with advanced, multi-compartment prolapse treated between 2019 and 2021. The lateral suspension took less operating time and caused less blood loss, with no surgical failures in its group during the study. Anatomical results and quality-of-life gains matched the standard operation, and bowel emptying problems were rarer after lateral suspension at three years.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Guanghua Chu, Chunyan Hu, Qi Deng |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 29 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |