A novel plate design versus two conventional miniplates for treatment of mandibular angle fractures (a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial)
Peter N. El-Masry, Nevein S. Mohamed, Mohamed E. Saber · 2026
Read A novel plate design versus two conventional miniplates for treatment of mandibular angle fractures (a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial) by Peter N. El-Masry, Nevein S. Mohamed, Mohamed E. Saber (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13180284.txt.
Description
Peter El-Masry, Nevein Mohamed, and Mohamed Saber run a 2026 pilot trial that tests a new plate design for fractures of the mandibular angle. Jaw fractures are among the most common breaks of the face, after nasal breaks, and firm fixation helps them heal fast.
Patients with this break were split at random between the new Sagittal Split Osteotomy Plate and the standard fix with two miniplates. The team compared clinical and X-ray results for the two groups. They also judged how stable the new plate is in use. The trial was small, as a pilot, and meant to test the design.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Peter N. El-Masry, Nevein S. Mohamed, Mohamed E. Saber |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 41 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |