A Retrospective Study: Comparative Visual Performance of Two Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses: TECNIS PureSee versus Clareon Vivity
Junha Kang, Jeewon Han, Chung Min Lee, Nahyun Park, Yea Eun Lee, Kyu Sang Eah, Ho Seok Chung, Jae Yong Kim, Ronald Yeoh, Hyeck-Soo Son, Hun Lee · 2026
Read A Retrospective Study: Comparative Visual Performance of Two Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses: TECNIS PureSee versus Clareon Vivity by Junha Kang, Jeewon Han, Chung Min Lee, Nahyun Park, Yea Eun Lee, Kyu Sang Eah, Ho Seok Chung, Jae Yong Kim, Ronald Yeoh, Hyeck-Soo Son, Hun Lee (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13142695.txt.
Description
Junha Kang and ten co-authors present a 2026 study comparing two replacement lenses used in cataract surgery. Both lenses stretch the range of clear focus without splitting light, so patients can see far and near with fewer glasses. The study asks how the two brands stack up in real patients.
The team looked back at 102 eyes, half fitted with each lens. Two months after surgery, they checked sharpness at several ranges, focus curves, and contrast in bright and dim light. Patients also rated their sight and any glare or halos. Both lenses gave like results at far and near range, while one did better at arm's length.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Junha Kang, Jeewon Han, Chung Min Lee, Nahyun Park, Yea Eun Lee, Kyu Sang Eah, Ho Seok Chung, Jae Yong Kim, Ronald Yeoh, Hyeck-Soo Son, Hun Lee |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 30 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |