Efficacy and safety of mesh reinforced cruroplasty with Phasix™ ST vs. Bio-A®: systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis
Michele Manara, Davide Bona, Sara De Bernardi, Marta Cavalli, Quan Wang, Gianluca Bonitta, Davide Guido, Antonio Biondi, Giampiero Campanelli, Luigi Bonavina, Alberto Aiolfi · 2026
Read Efficacy and safety of mesh reinforced cruroplasty with Phasix™ ST vs. Bio-A®: systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis by Michele Manara, Davide Bona, Sara De Bernardi, Marta Cavalli, Quan Wang, Gianluca Bonitta, Davide Guido, Antonio Biondi, Giampiero Campanelli, Luigi Bonavina, Alberto Aiolfi (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-13083453.txt.
Description
PurposeRecurrence remains a major challenge after minimally invasive hiatus hernia (HH) repair, particularly in patients with large diaphragmatic defects. Currently, biosynthetic absorbable meshes such as Bio-A® and Phasix™ ST are widely used to reinforce cruroplasty, however evidence comparing their efficacy and safety profile remains limited.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Michele Manara, Davide Bona, Sara De Bernardi, Marta Cavalli, Quan Wang, Gianluca Bonitta, Davide Guido, Antonio Biondi, Giampiero Campanelli, Luigi Bonavina, Alberto Aiolfi |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 33 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |