Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of the digital static guide versus the freehand approach in endodontic microsurgery: in vitro study
Abdulmalik Abdulrahman Alhelali, Amr Mohamed Abdallah, Muhammad Attia, Pervine Hassan Sharaf · 2025
Read Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of the digital static guide versus the freehand approach in endodontic microsurgery: in vitro study by Abdulmalik Abdulrahman Alhelali, Amr Mohamed Abdallah, Muhammad Attia, Pervine Hassan Sharaf (2025) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-12853720.txt.
Description
Abdulmalik Abdulrahman Alhelali and three co-authors compare a digital static guide with the freehand approach in root-end surgery, in a 2025 lab study. Such surgery on a tooth root has long been done by eye and hand. A printed guide that locks the drill path could lift precision and safety.
Printed models of jaws, with printed lower premolar teeth, were scanned and split by where the mental foramen sits. One group was cut freehand and one with the guide. The team read how well the nerve opening was kept safe, how large the cut was, and how long each task took.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Abdulmalik Abdulrahman Alhelali, Amr Mohamed Abdallah, Muhammad Attia, Pervine Hassan Sharaf |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2025 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 24 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |