Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Ovarian Cystectomy: A Meta-Analysis
Greg J Marchand, Ahmed T Abdelsattar, Daniela Gonzalez Herrera, Mckenna Robinson, Emily Kline, Sarah Mera, Michelle Koshaba, Nidhi Pulicherla, Ali Azadi, Johannes Ott · 2025
Read Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Ovarian Cystectomy: A Meta-Analysis by Greg J Marchand, Ahmed T Abdelsattar, Daniela Gonzalez Herrera, Mckenna Robinson, Emily Kline, Sarah Mera, Michelle Koshaba, Nidhi Pulicherla, Ali Azadi, Johannes Ott (2025) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-12734174.txt.
Description
A team of surgeons compare two ways to remove ovarian cysts in this 2025 meta-analysis. One route is single-site surgery, where all tools pass through one small cut. The other is conventional laparoscopy, which uses several ports. Both treat benign cysts, and patients care about pain and recovery as much as success.
The team searched five databases for studies up to June 2024. They kept randomized trials and observational studies that compared the two routes head to head for cyst removal. Main outcomes were operating time, blood loss, hospital stay, pain after surgery, and complications. Results were pooled as mean differences or risk ratios with confidence intervals. The synthesis aims to tell surgeons and patients what the single-cut route gains or loses against the standard one.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Greg J Marchand, Ahmed T Abdelsattar, Daniela Gonzalez Herrera, Mckenna Robinson, Emily Kline, Sarah Mera, Michelle Koshaba, Nidhi Pulicherla, Ali Azadi, Johannes Ott |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2025 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 32 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |