Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Performance of Three Different Inlays Based on Fabrication: An In Vivo Study
MS Kalpana, Sophia Thakur, Benin Paulaian, Nagammai Meyappan, T Shunmuga Priya, S Santhoshi · 2024
Read Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Performance of Three Different Inlays Based on Fabrication: An In Vivo Study by MS Kalpana, Sophia Thakur, Benin Paulaian, Nagammai Meyappan, T Shunmuga Priya, S Santhoshi (2024) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-11888709.txt.
Description
Kalpana and five colleagues compare three kinds of dental inlay in patients' mouths, in a twenty twenty-four study. Inlays are custom fillings set into a tooth. The team tested direct composite, lab-made composite, and ceramic inlays in thirty adults treated at a dental college in Karnataka, India. They checked pain after care, fit at the edges, staining, and new decay.
All three types performed well across the checks. No clear gap appeared between them on the main measures. Lab composites looked and felt like ceramics, while ceramics fit the cavity shape slightly better in past reports. The authors say choice can rest on cost and patient taste, since outcomes were alike.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | MS Kalpana, Sophia Thakur, Benin Paulaian, Nagammai Meyappan, T Shunmuga Priya, S Santhoshi |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2024 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 14 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |