Comparative Study on Recovery and Post-Operative Analgesic Efficacy from Fentanyl- Versus Dexmedetomidine-Based Anesthesia in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Liza Mohanty, Ravi Kumar, Deepak Tugave, Anagha Agrawal, Sejal Patel, Monika Tanwar, Lalit Patil · 2024
Read Comparative Study on Recovery and Post-Operative Analgesic Efficacy from Fentanyl- Versus Dexmedetomidine-Based Anesthesia in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery by Liza Mohanty, Ravi Kumar, Deepak Tugave, Anagha Agrawal, Sejal Patel, Monika Tanwar, Lalit Patil (2024) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-11805121.txt.
Description
Liza Mohanty and co-authors compare two anesthesia plans for head and neck cancer surgery by how patients wake and how much pain follows. Their 2024 trial assigns 120 patients by chance to a fentanyl-based plan or a dexmedetomidine-based plan, sixty in each arm. Recovery was scored on a standard readiness scale, and pain on the usual ten-point visual scale in the first hours.
Head and neck operations are long and delicate, and the hours after them set the tone for the whole stay. A plan that trades a strong opioid for a sedative with pain-sparing traits could ease that window. The trial's head-to-head numbers give anesthetists direct evidence for this exact surgical setting.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Liza Mohanty, Ravi Kumar, Deepak Tugave, Anagha Agrawal, Sejal Patel, Monika Tanwar, Lalit Patil |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2024 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 10 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |