Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Methods for Dashboards in Health Care: Scoping Review
Danielle Helminski, Jeremy B Sussman, Paul N Pfeiffer, Alex N Kokaly, Allison Ranusch, Anjana Deep Renji, Laura J Damschroder, Zach Landis-Lewis, Jacob E Kurlander, Christian Lovis, Jiban Khuntia · 2024
Read Development, Implementation, and Evaluation Methods for Dashboards in Health Care: Scoping Review by Danielle Helminski, Jeremy B Sussman, Paul N Pfeiffer, Alex N Kokaly, Allison Ranusch, Anjana Deep Renji, Laura J Damschroder, Zach Landis-Lewis, Jacob E Kurlander, Christian Lovis, Jiban Khuntia (2024) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-11651422.txt.
Description
Danielle Helminski and co-authors offer a 2024 review of dashboards in health care. Dashboards are now common in clinics and hospitals, but they only help if users take them up. The team searched four sources for studies from 2018 to 2020 that built or tested a health dashboard. They charted setting, purpose, users, and the methods used to boost uptake.
From 116 papers, data were drawn for 118 dashboards. Inpatient and outpatient settings were most common. Most dashboards served frontline clinical staff and had more than one purpose. Half involved end users in the design. Training, audit with feedback, and advisory boards were the top uptake tactics. Few studies used a theory or frame to guide the work.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Danielle Helminski, Jeremy B Sussman, Paul N Pfeiffer, Alex N Kokaly, Allison Ranusch, Anjana Deep Renji, Laura J Damschroder, Zach Landis-Lewis, Jacob E Kurlander, Christian Lovis, Jiban Khuntia |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2024 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 45 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |