How has co-design been used to address vaccine hesitancy globally? A systematic review
Filipa Alpeza, Helena Avermark, Elisa Gobbo, Sibylle Herzig van Wees · 2024
Read How has co-design been used to address vaccine hesitancy globally? A systematic review by Filipa Alpeza, Helena Avermark, Elisa Gobbo, Sibylle Herzig van Wees (2024) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-11639369.txt.
Description
Filipa Alpeza and co-authors review whether designing vaccine campaigns with the public beats designing for them, in a 2024 study. Vaccine hesitancy has many roots, so health teams increasingly invite hesitant communities to co-design the fix.
The review searched six databases and kept twenty-seven studies from around the world, most in rich countries. Campaigns for COVID-19 and HPV shots dominated, and video was the most common product of the joint work. Reporting styles varied widely, and few teams checked whether their co-designed campaigns actually raised uptake. The authors map what exists and urge clearer reporting and real outcome tests, so co-design can prove its worth.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Filipa Alpeza, Helena Avermark, Elisa Gobbo, Sibylle Herzig van Wees |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2024 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 48 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |