ArtiSential versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective matched cohort study
Dae Hee Pyo, Yoon Suk Lee, Byung Soh Min, Jaeim Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Heung-Kwon Oh, Yong Sik Yoon, Donghwan Bae, Jung Wook Huh · 2024
Read ArtiSential versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective matched cohort study by Dae Hee Pyo, Yoon Suk Lee, Byung Soh Min, Jaeim Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Heung-Kwon Oh, Yong Sik Yoon, Donghwan Bae, Jung Wook Huh (2024) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-11634190.txt.
Description
Dae Hee Pyo and eight colleagues compared a bending laparoscopic instrument against rigid tools in colorectal cancer surgery. Straight tools limit wrist-like movement inside the abdomen. The ArtiSential device bends at its tip, which promises easier suturing and dissection. The study looked back at seven Korean hospitals, from twenty twenty-one to twenty twenty-two. Propensity matching paired 694 patients in the bending-tool group with 694 in the rigid-tool group.
Operating time was slightly longer with the bending tool, though not significantly so. No bending-tool case converted to open surgery, against one percent of rigid-tool cases. Overall complications ran about nine and a half percent in the bending-tool group. Baseline features were balanced after matching. This twenty twenty-four study sizes up whether a bending tip earns its place in cancer surgery.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Dae Hee Pyo, Yoon Suk Lee, Byung Soh Min, Jaeim Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Heung-Kwon Oh, Yong Sik Yoon, Donghwan Bae, Jung Wook Huh |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2024 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 28 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |