Patient-Reported Outcomes Associated With “Completely Better” Status at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy
Matthew P. Kolevar, Evan L. Honig, Michael S. Rocca, Samir Kaveeshwar, Andrew Tran, Jacob T. Hartline, Natalie L. Leong, Jonathan D. Packer, R. Frank Henn, Sean J. Meredith · 2024
Read Patient-Reported Outcomes Associated With “Completely Better” Status at 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy by Matthew P. Kolevar, Evan L. Honig, Michael S. Rocca, Samir Kaveeshwar, Andrew Tran, Jacob T. Hartline, Natalie L. Leong, Jonathan D. Packer, R. Frank Henn, Sean J. Meredith (2024) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/pmc-11632956.txt.
Description
Matthew Kolevar and nine co-authors ask what scores match a patient's sense of being fully healed after hip surgery in a 2024 study. Hip arthroscopy patients rate their own outcomes on standard forms, but no one had mapped the strictest verdict, completely better, onto those scores. The team followed patients of one center for two years after surgery.
Of sixty two patients, twenty nine, near half, said the condition was completely better at two years. The groups did not split by age, sex, weight, race, past surgery, or hopes going in. The fully healed group posted better scores across function, pain, and mental health forms. The authors set score thresholds that flag full healing at high confidence. The marks give clinics a plain target to quote.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Matthew P. Kolevar, Evan L. Honig, Michael S. Rocca, Samir Kaveeshwar, Andrew Tran, Jacob T. Hartline, Natalie L. Leong, Jonathan D. Packer, R. Frank Henn, Sean J. Meredith |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2024 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 29 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | Europe PMC |