The Benefits of Diversity: Combining Comparisons and Ratings for Efficient Scoring
Julien Fageot, Matthias Grossglauser, Lê-Nguyên Hoang, Matteo Tacchi-Bénard, Oscar Villemaud · 2026
Read The Benefits of Diversity: Combining Comparisons and Ratings for Efficient Scoring by Julien Fageot, Matthias Grossglauser, Lê-Nguyên Hoang, Matteo Tacchi-Bénard, Oscar Villemaud (2026) in the Tower of Babel, a free online library of public-domain works preserved in clean, searchable text. No sign-up. The full text is served as a plain-text file at a predictable URL, where text is present: https://antarctic-labs.com/tower-of-babel/arxiv-2602-08033.txt.
Description
Should people rate items one by one or compare them in pairs? Julien Fageot and four co-authors show that combining both kinds of judgment can beat either alone. Their SCoRa model learns scores from comparisons and ratings together in a unified probabilistic method.
Theory shows the maximum a posteriori estimator is well-behaved, satisfying monotonicity and robustness guarantees, and tests confirm accurate score recovery even when the model is misspecified. The advantage of combining signals is largest when correctly ordering the top items matters most. Preference-learning users gain a versatile foundation, since real systems usually collect both kinds of feedback anyway.
Catalog record
| CREATOR | Julien Fageot, Matthias Grossglauser, Lê-Nguyên Hoang, Matteo Tacchi-Bénard, Oscar Villemaud |
|---|---|
| YEAR | 2026 |
| COLLECTION | PAPERS |
| FORMAT | TXT |
| FILE SIZE | 61 KB |
| VERSION | 1.0 |
| LICENSE | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| RIGHTS | CC BY |
| SOURCE | arXiv |
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602-08033